IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
PATEL AJAYKUMAR CHAGANBHAI & others - Appellant
Versus
SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8069 of 2017
Decided On : 01-07-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25F - Oral termination to be null and void - Order or direction directing the respondent-Corporation to reinstate the petitioners with full backwages and all consequential benefits in their original posts - Corporation to permanently restraining - Pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions holding and declaring that oral termination of the Some of the of petitioners mentioned in para 8 of present petition, made by respondent-Corporation is absolutely illegal, unjustified and further be pleased to quash and set aside such oral termination of petitioners, who were serving as contractual third grade computer operator - Pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing respondent-Corporation to reinstate petitioners with full backwages and all consequential benefits in their original posts - Pleased issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions directing respondent-Corporation to treat petitioners as regular appointees in post of computer operator (clerk) class third grade and continue petitioners in said posts on regular basis at par with another permanent employees of corporation and to extend then the benefits and status of permanent employees retrospectively of completion of 240 days of service from their dates of joining –
Finding of the Court:
Court in the cases above referred to and in light of this judgment - State Governments and their instrumentalities should take steps to regularize as a one time measure, the services of such irregularly appointed, who have worked for ten years or more in duly sanctioned posts but not under cover of orders of courts or of tribunals and should further ensure that regular recruitments are undertaken to fill those vacant sanctioned posts that require to be filled up, in cases where temporary employees or daily wagers are being now employed - Process must be set in motion within six months from this date. We also clarify that regularization, if any already made, but not subjudice, need not be reopened based on this judgment, but there should be no further by-passing of the constitutional requirement and regularizing or making permanent, those not duly appointed as per the constitutional scheme - Petitioners who are not employed by Surat Municipal Corporation cannot claim regularisation or any benefit as prayed in this petition as they were employed by the contractor or agency through respondent Corporation which was entrusted the work to supply man-power - Consequences of the appointment being temporary, casual or contractual in nature - Such a person cannot invoke the theory of legitimate expectation for being confirmed in post when an appointment to the post could be made only by following a proper procedure for selection and in concerned cases, in consultation with the Public Service Commission - Theory of legitimate expectation cannot be successfully advanced by temporary, contractual or casual employees - It cannot also be held that the State has held out any promise while engaging these persons either to continue them where they are or to make them permanent –
Result: Petition is dismissed
ORDER :
1. On 15th June, 2021 the following order was passed:
To be listed for dictation of order on 24th June, 2021 at 2:30 pm.”
2. On 24th June, 2021 due to paucity of time, the matter was adjourned today.
3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :
(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent-Corporation to reinstate the petitioners with full backwages and all consequential benefits in their original posts;
(c) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions directing the respondent-Corporation to regularize the service of the petitioners;
ALTERNATIVELY
(C) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased the issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions directing the respondent-Corporation to treat the petitioners as regular appointees in the post of computer operator (clerk) class third grade and continue the petitioners in the said posts on the regular basis at par with another permanent employees of the corporation and to extend then the benefits and status of permanent employees retrospectively from the date of completion of 240 days of service from their dates of joining.
(D) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent-Corporation to permanently restraining the respondent from recruiting or appointing any employee to any of vacant posts of computer operator, which are fallen vacant due to termination of the some of the petitioners;
(E) During pendency and final disposal of the present applications, YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to direct the respondent-Corporation to permit the terminated petitioners to serve on their original posts as a computer operator (clerk) with the respondent-Corporation;
(F) Pass any such other and/ or further orders that may be thought just and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the present case;”
4. Learned advocate Mr. Shakti Jadeja has tendered the draft amendment to add the name of one Pinky Ashokbhai Parmar as petitioner which is granted.
5. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were working on the post of Computer Operator (Clerk) through contractor with the respondent Surat Municipal Corporation for different years ranging from 1.5 years to 12 years and the services of some of the petitioners were orally terminated as mentioned in the statement at Annexure-A to the petition.
5.1 It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners were working through contractor namely Akar HR Management Pvt. Ltd., Shiv Sai computers with the respondent Corporation. The respondent Corporation had issued advertisement in the year 2013 for various posts including 404 posts of Clerk (Grade-III). Pursuant to such advertisement, against 404 regular posts, total 774 persons were given appointment and waiting list of 888 persons was published.
5.2 Some
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.