SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 489

UMESH A.TRIVEDI
S. A. Industries – Appellant
Versus
Shivramdas Motiram Sant – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Yogi K. Gadhia.

ORDER :

1. By way of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-employer has filed this petition challenging the judgment and award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Navsari, dated 31.12.2019 in Reference (T) No. 1/2018 whereby the Labour Court has partly allowed the Reference filed by the respondent-workman and awarded lump-sum compensation of Rs. 75,000/- in lieu of reinstatement as also Rs. 2,000/- towards cost of the Reference to be paid to respondent-workman.

2. The brief facts of the case are as under:

    2.1 It is the case of the respondent-workman that he was working with the petitioner as Manager since last about 13 years and he was carrying on his duties honestly and diligently. He has asserted that he was being paid Rs. 75,000/- towards his monthly salary. He has stated about his services that he was working with other sister concern Company of the petitioner at Mumbai and on a request by petitioner-employer he had shifted to Gujarat at Bilimora, District Navsari in the petitioner-Company. Since, he was considered to be faithful to the Company, he was forced to come to Gujarat on assurance of providing him residence. It i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top