J.B.PARDIWALA, VAIBHAVI D.NANAVATI
RAYSANGJI ABHAJI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
1. The writ-applicants of both the writ-applications are in the business of supplying water to the various units in GIDC, Pandesara, Surat. Both are also in the business of supplying water to the residential units as well as the industrial houses.
2. The facts giving rise to the Special Civil Application No.15111 of 2014 are as under :-
2.1 The writ-applicants Nos.1 and 2 are carrying on business in the Pandesara Industrial Estate of selling and supplying water to various industrial units through bore-wells. The writ applicant No.3 represents the labour Union and they are labourers working in the units situated in the Pandesara Industrial Estate.
2.2 According to the writ-applicants, the Surat Municipal Corporation is not able to supply sufficient water to the Pandesara Industrial Estate. The industrial units are compelled to take water supplied through the tankers and private borewells. The workers are thus facing serious problem of earning their livelihood and they are compelled to live life without dignity.
2.3 The workers made representation to the writ-applicant No.3 to represent their case before this Court in view of the arbitrary policy of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.