SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 522

BIREN VAISHNAV
AMITA C. NANAVATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :MS. SHIVANGI RANA, ADVOCATE FOR MR SP MAJMUDAR
For the Respondent: MR NAGESH C SOOD

JUDGMENT :

1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the following prayers, which was subsequently amended. The original prayer and the amended prayers read as under:

    “23(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions quashing and setting aside the inquiry officers report dated 08.11.2004 in respect of chargesheet No. AGM/III/DC/39 (at Annexure-G hereto) as well as order dated 31.08.2006 passed by the disciplinary authority (at Annexure-N hereto) and 17.01.2007 passed by the appellate authority of the respondent – Bank (at Annexure – P hereto) and further be pleased to direct the respondent – Bank to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits;

Amended carried out as per Court’s order

23(AA) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside impugned order dated 14.07.2017 (at ANNEXURE-Q) issued by respondent – bank to rel

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top