SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 655

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.H.VORA, J.
RAMANBHAI BHOLIDAS PATEL – APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – RESPONDENT
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 11076 of 2021
Decided on : 26-08-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR IH SYED, SR. COUNSEL WITH MR ANIQ A KADRI
For the Respondent: MR MITESH AMIN, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1806 – Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 439 and 145 - Sale deed – Land – Partner – Company - Impugned FIR is pertaining to land which complainant inherited from his mother - It is alleged that recently complainant had got records of land checked and it came to his knowledge that said land had been sold to one & Company where he was shown as seller and the partners and company were shown as purchasers of the land - It is alleged that partners of said one and company and applicant in conspiracy with each other to take away complainant's land executed sale deed between complainant and his wife and got same registered with authorities in 1975.

Finding of Court :

Learned PP opposed bail application on premise that the applicant is involved in other six offences more particularly, described in affidavit of IO - Court have minutely examined allegations made in FIRs - Out of six FIRs, two FIRs relates to way back to alleged offence and in one FIR, it is stated at bar by learned advocate for the applicant that civil and revenue proceedings have attained finality - If breach of any of above conditions is committed, Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in matter - Bail bond to be executed before lower court having jurisdiction to try the case - At the trial, trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging applicant on bail - Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent - Direct service is permitted.

Result : Order accordingly.

ORDER :

1. Heard learned senior counsel Mr.I.H.Syed for the applicant and learned PP Mr. Mitesh Amin for the respondent- State.

2. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. registered at C.R.No.11191045202201 of 2020 with Sola High Court Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC.

3. Facts of the case is as under :-

    3.1. The impugned FIR is pertaining to land bearing survey no.342/2 located at Thaltej Village which the complainant inherited from his mother on 08.04.1965.

3.2. It is alleged that recently the complainant had got 7/12 records of the land checked and it came to his knowledge that said land had been sold to one M/s. Padhar & Company where he was shown as seller and the partners of M/s. Padhar and company i.e. Purshottam Revandas, Prabhudas Revandas, Kanjibhai Revandas and Lt. Revandas Kehraji were shown as purchasers of the land.

3.3. It is alleged that partners of M/s. Padhar and company and the applicant in conspiracy with each other to take away the complainant's land executed sale deed between the complainant and his wife and got the same registered with the authorities in 1975.

3.4. It is alleged that thereafter, the accused persons in connivance with each other transferred the said land to Someshwara Darshan Kheti Sahkari Mandli Ltd. in the garb of the registered sale deed between the complainant and his wife. In substance, it is alleged that since the year 1975, till date, the applicant and other accused persons in connivance and in collusion with each other hatched criminal conspiracy to grab subject land of FIR bearing survey no.342/ 2 and got executed registered sale deed which does not bear thumb impression of the first informant and in collusion with officers of the State, subject land of FIR was mutated into revenue record in favour of accused persons. Hence, FIR.

4. Learned Senior Counsel Mr. I.H.Syed for the applicant and learned PP Mr. Mitesh Amin took the Court through various documentary evidence pertaining to subject land bearing survey no.342/2 situated at Thaltej. The gist of the same is as under :-

    4.1. On 21.09.1959, by way of M.E.No.2792 (Heirship) name of Bai Kanku d/o Rupali Bawa Gajuji was mutated in the records of land bearing Survey No.342/2 at Thaltej.

4.2. On 08.04.1965, by way of M.E.No.3252 (Heirship) name of Khodaji Visaji (complainant) s/o Bai Kanku was mutated in the records of land bearing Survey No.342/2 at Thaltej.

4.3. On 30.04.1971, since land at Sr.No.342/2 at Thaltej was a ‘New Tenure Land’ due permission to execute the sale of the land u/s 43 of the Tenancy Act was taken from the Deputy Collector vide order dated 30.04.1971.

4.4. That on 21.01.1972, complainant executed sale deed No.1048 in favour of partners of M/s. Padhar and company i.e. Parshottam Revandas and Ors. after taking above mentioned permission.

4.5. That on 09.05.1975, permission granted on 30.04.191 by the Deputy Collector was mutated in the records vide M.E.No.5027.

4.6. That on 20.09.1975, impugned land sold to Parshottam Revandas vide registered sale deed executed by the complainant was mutated in the records.

4.7. On 20.08.1975, the complainant executed a registered partition deed for himself, his wife and his minor heirs to partition the said land and his house on that land. The intention behind doing the same is best known to the complainant. 4.8. That on 22.07.1977, Revandas Kaharbhai passed away.

4.9. On 20.09.1977, by way of M.E.No.5272 (Heirship) Revandas’ name was deleted from the records and remaining three names of Parshottam Revandas and ors remained in the records of impugned land.

4.10. On 19.05.1980, partnership firm M/s. Padhar and Company was dissolved and only the names of three partners i.e. Parshottam Revandas and Ors. remained in the records of the impugned land. This was mutated in the records vide M.E.No.5486.

4.11. That on 12.10.1990, Someshwara Darshan

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top