GITA GOPI
MAGANBHAI UKABHAI POSIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rule. Learned advocates waive service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents. With the consent of both the sides, the matters are heard finally. 1. Both the petitions are filed with the prayer to quash and set aside the First Information Report being FIR No.11213006210092 registered with Bhayavdar Police Station, Rajkot Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 504, 506(2) and 114 of IPC and the consequential proceedings initiated in pursuance thereof qua the petitioners.
2. Heard learned advocate Mr. K.S. Chandrani appearing with learned advocate Mr. Tanmay Karia for the applicants, learned advocate Mr. Suraj Shukla for respondent No.2-original complainant and learned APP Mr. Pranav Trivedi appearing for the respondent-State.
3. Both the petitions arise out of the same First Information Report and involve identical questions on law and facts and hence, they are decided by this common order.
4. The facts in brief are that the petitioners herein are running a Firm in the name and style of Madhuvan Gold Art. According to the petitioners, they came into contact with one Mahipatsinh Chudasama and on learning about the good business income of accuse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.