BHARGAV D.KARIA
BHUPENDRA MANSUKHLAL VITHLANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUAJRAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Percy Kavina assisted by learned Advocate Mr. Nikunt Raval, learned AGP Mr. Dhawan Jayswal for Respondent Nos. 1 and 7, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Sudhir I. Nanavati assisted by learned Advocate Mr. P.B. Raval for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 and learned Advocate Mr. A.D. Oza for Respondent No.2.
2. Rule. Learned AGP Mr. Jayswal waives service of rule for Respondent Nos. 1 and 7, learned Advocate Mr. Raval waives for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 and learned Advocate Mr. Oza waives for Respondent No.2.
3. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner- Trust has prayed for the following reliefs;
(A) The Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the order impugned dated 29.02.2020;
(AA) Be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside order dated 17.03.2020 and consequently quashing and setting aside the directions issued thereto;
(B) Pending hearing and final disposal of the present petition, be pleased to stay the operation, implementation of the order impugned dated 29.02.2020;
(C) The Hon’ble Court may be pleased
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.