IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
BHAIKAKA UNIVERSITY - Appellant
Versus
FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE MEDICAL - Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7318 of 2021
Decided On : 08-10-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226 and 227 - Gujarat Private Universities Act, 2009 - Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges or Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) Act, 2007 - Section 9(1) and 10(3) - Higher Fees - Petitioner No.2 is the college - It is case of petitioner that a communication was received from Respondent, calling upon petitioner to appear before Respondent to explain charging of higher fees than what is determined.
Finding of the Court:
Fee Regulatory Committee cannot overlook aforesaid statutory provisions in Section 10(3) of Act that fee structure so determined by Fee Regulatory Committee shall be binding on unaided professional educational colleges or institutions for a period of three years and fee so determined shall be applicable to a student who completion of his professional course in that college or institution - Respondent could not have revised fees contrary to Section 10(3) of Act of 2007 - As held by Apex Court once fee is determined under Section 10(3) of Act of 2007,same is to remain intact for period of three years and students who have taken admission on basis of such fees determined by Respondent cannot be asked to pay fees on basis of revision which may be done by Respondent during period of three years within completion of professional courses in a college or institution - In view of above settled legal position Respondent could not have revised fee structure which was determined - Therefore without entering into veracity and legality of impugned order revising fees for block years as per above decision of Apex Court, is contrary to settled legal position so also to provisions of Section 10(3) of Act of 2007.
Result: Appeals allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Dhaval Dave assisted by learned Advocate Mr. Udit N. Vyas for the petitioners and learned Senior Advocate Ms. Manisha L. Shah assisted by the learned Advocate Mr. Harshil C. Dattani for the Respondent.
2. Rule. Learned AGP Mr. Dattani waives service of rule for the Respondent.
3. Having regard to the controversy arising in this matter in a narrow compass, with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, the same m is taken for final hearing and disposal today.
4. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:
(a) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction and thereby quash and set aside the impugned order dated March 15, 2021 passed by the Fee Regulatory Committee (Medical), the Respondent herein;
(b) That pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the petition, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay the effect, operation and implementation of the impugned order dated March 15, 2021 passed by the Fee Regulatory Committee (Medical), the Respondent herein;
(c) ...”
5. The brief facts of the case are that Petitioner No.1- is a non-affiliated private university, established under the Gujarat Private Universities Act, 2009 (in brief, the ‘Act of 2009’) with effect from 25th September, 2019.
5.1 Petitioner No.2 is the college established in the year 1987 by the Charutar Arogya Mandal for imparting education in the discipline of medicine with the prior approval of the competent authority, having intake capacity of 150 students at the level of post graduation level and intake capacity of 96 students in the post graduation diploma various broad specialties.
5.2 The Respondent “Fee Regulatory Committee Medical” is a body constituted under Section 9(1) of the Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges or Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) Act, 2007 (in brief, the ‘Act of 2007).
5.3 For the Academic Years 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, the Respondent determined the prescribed fee structure for the purpose of post graduate courses offered by Petitioner No.2- College by order dated 16th July, 2018 under the provisions of the Act of 2007.
5.4 It is the case of the petitioner that a communication was received from the Respondent, calling upon the petitioner to appear before the Respondent on 14th September, 2020 to explain the charging of higher fees than what is determined vide order dated 16th July, 2018.
5.4.1 Accordingly, the Petitioner No.2 submitted its reply along with the details of fees published by the Admission Committee for the Academic Years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 on 25th September, 2020.
5.5 Thereafter, on 15th October, 2020, the Respondent directed Petitioner No.2-College to furnish the break-up of the costs of imparting education into fixed cost and variable cost for the Academic Years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 on projected figures submitted at the time of fixation of fees and actual cost incurred during the concerned academic years.
5.6 The petitioners submitted details of break-up of the costs on 4th November, 2020, and after considering such details, the Respondent passed the impugned order dated 15th March, 2021, whereby, the Petitioners are directed to refund the excess fees charged from the students for the Academic Years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 by reducing the differential fees charged and collected from various students during the Academic Years 2018-2019 and 2019-2020.
5.6.1 At this juncture, it would be necessary to refer to the order dated 16th July, 2018, whereby, the Respondent has determined the Fee Structure of Petitioner No.2-College, which is as under;
| FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE (MEDICAL) GUJARAT STATE | ||||||||
| Near 5 Bungalows, Opp.: National Park Society, Behind Polytec | ||||||||
FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE VS. KALOL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT’ (2011) 10 SCC 592
Islamic Academy of Education and Another v. State of Karnataka and Others (2003) 6 SCC 697
T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others (2002) 8 SCC 481
P.A. Inamdar and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2005) 6 SCC 537
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.