BHARGAV D.KARIA
BHAIKAKA UNIVERSITY – Appellant
Versus
FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE MEDICAL – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Dhaval Dave assisted by learned Advocate Mr. Udit N. Vyas for the petitioners and learned Senior Advocate Ms. Manisha L. Shah assisted by the learned Advocate Mr. Harshil C. Dattani for the Respondent.
2. Rule. Learned AGP Mr. Dattani waives service of rule for the Respondent.
3. Having regard to the controversy arising in this matter in a narrow compass, with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, the same m is taken for final hearing and disposal today.
4. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:
(a) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction and thereby quash and set aside the impugned order dated March 15, 2021 passed by the Fee Regulatory Committee (Medical), the Respondent herein;
(b) That pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the petition, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to stay the effect, operation and implementation of the impugned order dated
FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE VS. KALOL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT’ (2011) 10 SCC 592
Islamic Academy of Education and Another v. State of Karnataka and Others (2003) 6 SCC 697
T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others (2002) 8 SCC 481
P.A. Inamdar and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2005) 6 SCC 537
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.