J.B.PARDIWALA, VAIBHAVI D.NANAVATI
JINMANGAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
(c) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions directing the respondents to issue fresh allotment letter for commercial plot in Chandkheda TPS No.22 final plot No.265 admeasuring 3411.00 sq. mtr with clarification that petitioner will deposit amount of GST of Rs.5,49,14,787 with authority concerned out of total consideration of Rs.35,99,96,940/- and remaining amount of Rs.30,50,82,153/- to be deposited with respondents.
(d) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, the respondents be restrained from issuing allotment letter for commercial plot in Chandkheda TPS No.22 final plot No.
Kailash Nath Associates vs. Delhi Development Authority
Fateh Chand vs. Balkishan Dass
K. P. Subbarama Sasra and others vs. K. S. Raghavan and others
Punjab National Bank and others vs. Atmanand Singh and others
Karsandas H. Thacker vs. Saran Engineering Co. Ltd.
Satish Batra vs. Sudhir Rawal (2013) 1 SCC 345
Videocon Properties Limited vs. Bhalchandra Laboratories
ONGC Ltd. Vs. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) 5 SCC 705
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.