SANGEETA K.VISHEN
VASANTIBEN VASHRAMBHAI GALCHAR – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPALITIES ADMINISTRATION, GUJARAT STATE – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.
2. Rule. Mr. Bharat Vyas, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 3, Mr. Anand V. Thakkar, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent nos.5, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 14, Mr. D.V. Kansara, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent nos.4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 and Mr. Vijay H. Nangesh, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent no.2.
3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 18.6.2021 passed by the respondent no.1 – Commissioner, Municipalities Administration (hereinafter referred to as “the Commissioner”) in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 37 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1963’) whereby, the petitioners are removed as Councillors of the respondent no.2-Dhanera Municipality (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Municipality’). It is alleged that the order is passed with mala fide intention because the petitioners belong to the
Sharda Kailash Mittal vs. State of M.P. reported in (2010) 2 SCC 319
Tarlochan Dev Sharma vs. State of Punjab reported in (2001) 6 SCC 260
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir vs. The Collector
Baldev Singh Gandhi vs. State of Punjab reported in (2002) 3 SCC 667
Nitinkumar M. Brahmbhatt vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2006 (3) GLR 2615
A.I. Patel vs. State of Gujarat reported in 1994 (2) GLR 1402
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.