R.M.CHHAYA, NIRZAR S.DESAI
Pravinchandra Venilal Sopariwala – Appellant
Versus
Chairman and Managing Director bank of Baroda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NIRZAR S. DESAI, J.
1. Heard Mr. Vishwas K. Shah, learned advocate for Ms. Bhavna V. Shah, learned advocate for appellants and Mr. Darshan M. Parikh, learned advocate for the respondents.
2. ADMIT. Mr. Darshan M. Parikh, learned advocate for the respondents waive service of notice of admission.
3. By consent of the parties, the matter was taken up for final hearing.
4. The parties were heard at length. While keeping the matter for orders on 20.07.2021, this Court passed the following order:
2. Mr. Vishwas K. Shah, learned advocate for the appellants has candidly submitted that he does not challenge the aspect whether a person after superannuation can be subjected to major punishment or not. Mr. Shah further contended that he challenged the punishment imposed and proportionality of the same.
3. No other or further submissions, averments, grounds and/or contentions are made by Mr. Shah, learned advocate for the appellants.
4. We have extenso heard Mr. Vishwas K. Shah, learned advocate for the app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.