IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J.
Shivanginiben Vishalkumar Patel - Appellant
Versus
District Development Officer - Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 12707 of 2021
Decided on : 13-09-2021
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 226 - Gujarat Panchayats Act – Section 57(1),57(3) and 253 - Election petition - Financial irregularities - Case of petitioner is that petitioner belongs to Socially and Economically Backward Class, who contested election of Gram Panchayat, and was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat - First meeting of Gram Panchayat was held and from that date, petitioner took charge as Sarpanch - Petitioner contested said post on seat of Socially and Economically Backward Class - woman category - Panchayat comprises of 10 members and one Sarpanch - It is say of petitioner that Talati-cum-Mantri, at relevant point of time, was one and she was posted at Gadariya Gram Panchayat and was transferred - It was also alleged about financial irregularities and thereby called upon petitioner to remain present before respondent to submit her representation - Show cause notice contains 13 articles of charges levelled against petitioner, but then relying upon report of Accounts Officer, District Panchayat, Valsad present show cause notice was issued - Whether it is obligatory, mandatory or directory, is scheme of statute in which “duty” has been set out.
Finding of the court : In view of aforesaid circumstances which are stated herein before and in view of aforesaid proposition of law laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court, factual details which are tried to be agitated here in petition, can well be examined by competent authority who has afforded an opportunity by issuance of notice - Disputed questions of fact are not to be adjudicated or agitated normally in writ jurisdiction - Law is absolutely clear on such in a decision reported - Hence, in view of aforesaid peculiar background of facts, no case is made out by petitioner to call for any interference at this stage - In light of aforesaid background of facts, decisions which have been tried to be relied upon by learned advocate for petitioner and having gone through and considered the same, same are not possible to be of any assistance to petitioner and again it is quite settled position of law that if facts are different, ratio laid down in another decision cannot be applied as a straitjacket formula - One additional fact may make a world of difference in applying the principle - As a result of this, contentions raised by petitioner deserve no consideration.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the reliefs :-
(B) Pending admission and final disposal of the present petition, be pleased to stay the implementation, operation and execution of the impugned show cause notice issued by the respondent dated 05-07/08/2021 - Annexure - K, and further be pleased to retrain the respondent, his agents and servants from restraining the petitioner from discharging her duty as a Sarpanch of Gadariya Gram Panchayat;
(C) Be pleased to pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper.”
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner belongs to Socially and Economically Backward Class, who contested the election of Gram Panchayat, Gadariya in December 2016 and was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Gadariya. The first meeting of Gram Panchayat was held on 24.10.2017 and from that date, the petitioner took the charge as Sarpanch. The petitioner contested the said post on the seat of Socially and Economically Backward Class - woman category. The Panchayat comprises of 10 members and one Sarpanch. It is the say of the petitioner that the Talati-cum-Mantri, at the relevant point of time, was one Ms. Margiben Shah and she was posted from 2017 at Gadariya Gram Panchayat and was transferred in June 2019. The said Talati-cum-Mantri never cooperated with any of the Panchayat matters and had become arrogant and unbecoming of her office. According to the petitioner, on account of such conduct of Talati-cum-Mantri, various complaints were made by Sarpanch and other members of Gram Panchayat about irregularities committed by the said Talati-cum- Mantri not only about her working but also about her behaviour. One application was also submitted to the District President on 27.09.2018 indicating that the said Talati-cum-Mantri is behaving in a very graceful manner and is refusing to cooperate in any of the works of the Gram Panchayat along with the other grievances which are mentioned. However, according to the petitioner, no steps were taken. By narrating this, the petitioner has then submitted that the show cause notice came to be issued in exercise of powers under sub-section (1) of Section 57 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act calling upon the petitioner as to why she should not be removed from the post of Sarpanch on account of irregularities and negligence in discharge of her duties and also for abusing her office. It was also alleged about financial irregularities and thereby called upon the petitioner to remain present before the respondent on 14.11.2019 to submit her representation. The show cause notice contains 13 articles of charges levelled against the petitioner, but then relying upon the report of Accounts Officer, District Panchayat, Valsad dated 20.08.2018, present show cause notice was issued. According to the petitioner, the said notice had been replied denying all the charges levelled against her and then, the authority, in exercise of power under Section 57(1) of the Act, issued an order on 06.01.2020 removing the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch of Gadariya Gram Panchayat. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said order, the petitioner approached the appellate authority under Section 57(3) of the Act by preferring Appeal No. 7 of 2020 along with application for interim relief. Since no hearing had taken place, the petitioner, at the relevant point of time, was constrained to preferred a writ petition being Special Civil Application No. 12526 of 2020 and the Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 11.02.2021 disposed of the same since the Additional Development Commissioner, Gujarat State was pleased to pass
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.