BHARGAV D.KARIA
PANDIAN NALLAKANNU NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – ARMB – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard, learned Advocate Mr. M.B. Gohil, for the petitioners, Mr. Digant B. Kakkad learned Advocate for the applicant-auction purchaser, and learned Advocate Mr. V.N. Sevak for the Respondent-Bank.
2. By way of Civil Application No.1 of 2021, the applicant-auction purchaser has prayed to vacate the interim relief granted by this Court vide order dated 27th September, 2021, while admitting Special Civil Application No. 14232 of
2021.
3. The brief facts of the case are as under:
3.1.1 The respondent-Bank has sanctioned overdraft limit of Rs.97,00,000/- in favour of M/ s. S.R. Construction Company, wherein the petitioners are guarantors and the credit facility provided by the respondent-Bank was secured by mortgage of the immovable property / the residential house of the petitioners.
3.2 The respondent bank issued notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.