BHARGAV D.KARIA
RAMANBHAI BECHARBHAI VAGHELA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Hardik C. Rawal for the petitioners, learned advocate Mr. H.S. Munshaw for respondent no.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Kurven Desai for the respondent-State through video conference.
2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Kurven Desai waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent-State and learned advocate Mr. H.S. Munshaw waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no.2
3. Learned advocate Mr. Hardik C. Rawal tendered the draft amendment on 6.8.2021 which was granted. However, inadvertently, order is not transcribed and therefore, the draft amendment is not carried out.
4. In view of this fact, the draft amendment tendered by the learned advocate Mr. Raval on 6.8.2021 is allowed in terms of the draft. To be carried out forthwith.
5. Learned advocate Mr. Rawal submitted that in view of the draft amendment being granted, Civil Application No.1/2021 is not pressed. Civil Application no.1/2021 is disposed of as not pressed.
6. Learned advocate Mr. Rawal further submitted that Civil Application No.2/2021 is by the legal heirs of original petitioner no.5 who expired on 12.12.2020
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.