J.B.PARDIWALA, ILESH J.VORA
HITACHI HI REL POWER ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B.PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
(b) pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, to stay implementation and operation of the impugned notice dated 20.12.2019 at Annexure ‘A’ to this petition and stay the assessment proceedings for AY 2017-18 undertaken by Respondent No.1;
(c) any other and further relief deemed just and proper be granted in the interest of justice;
(d) to provide for the cost of this petition”
2. The case put up by the writ applicant, in his writ application, may be summarized as under:
3. The writ applicant is a limited company. It seeks to challenge the reference made by the respondent No.1 to the respondent No.2 under Section 92CA (1) of the Income Tax Act (for short, “the Act”), in relation to the computation of Arm’s Length Price on the ground of being erroneous, illegal and contrary to law. The writ applicant further seeks to challenge the notice under Sections 92CA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.