SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 905

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
PATEL JITENDRAKUMAR SOMABHAI – APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF GUAJRAT – RESPONDENT
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22802 of 2019 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2020, CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR ORDERS) NO. 4 of 2020, CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR ORDERS) NO. 5 of 2020, CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR ORDERS) NO. 6 of 2020
Decided on : 31-08-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR PK JANI, SENIOR, R JIGAR G GADHAVI
For the Respondent: MR KM ANTANI, MS SEJAL K MANDAVIA, MR TEJAS SATTA

Point of Law: State Government would thereafter consider the recommendation, and, in its discretion make a decision under Section 7(2) of the Act.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 243Q - Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 – Section 7 and 7(2) – Election petition - Petitioners have challenged Notification issued by respondent – State in exercise of powers provided in Clause(g) of Article 243Q of Constitution of India read with Section – 7 of Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 by excluding certain local areas shown in column of Notification from local areas of existing Gram Panchayat of Taluka - District Mehsana shown in column of Schedule and new Gram Panchayat t is constituted - Village is bifurcated into two village Panchayats - After election of the Gram Panchayat of village first meeting of Gram Panchayat had taken place - During the second meeting a resolution was passed by Gram Panchayat to bifurcate village panchayat village into two village panchayats i.e. Gram Panchayat and Gram Panchayat - Whether such exercise of bifurcation was in accordance with law or not.

Finding of the court: There cannot be any other view with regard to settled legal position that impugned notification is in a nature of policy decision or is a legislative function of State Government and therefore, no interference can be made by the Court, but, in facts of case, when there is no proposal for recommendation after period of one year from date of last election either by Gram Panchayat or by DDO to Development Commissioner and by misinterpreting Resolution passed by Gram Panchayat, it cannot be said that there was an agreement by Gram Panchayat for division - As canvassed by the learned AGP that there was consultation with Gram Panchayat in view of resolution is also not tenable in the facts of case because said resolution was passed by Gram Panchayat in relation to Resolution only and the Resolution was passed within one year of date of last election of Gram Panchayat and any consequential resolution to said resolution cannot be said to be consultation as sought to be canvassed in facts of case.

Result: Petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. P.K. Jani assisted by learned advocate Mr. Jigar J. Gadhavi, learned advocate Mr. Tejas Satta for the applicants in Civil Application no.1 of 2020, learned advocate Mr. Sejal Mandavia for the respondent no.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. K.M. Antani for the respondent nos.1 and 3.

2. The petitioners have challenged the Notification dated 19th November, 2019 issued by the respondent – State in exercise of powers provided in Clause(g) of Article 243Q of the Constitution of India read with Section – 7 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 (for short ‘the Act, 1993') by excluding certain local areas shown in column no.5 of the Notification from the local areas of the existing Balol Gram Panchayat of Taluka - District Mehsana shown in column no.3 of the Schedule and new Gram Panchayat viz. Laxmipura/(Balol) Gram Panchayat is constituted.

3. Thus, Balol village is bifurcated into two village Panchayats. After the election of the Gram Panchayat of village Balol in 2017, the first meeting of the Gram Panchayat had taken place on 9th May, 2017. During the second meeting dated 17th May, 2017 a resolution was passed by the Balol Gram Panchayat to bifurcate the village panchayat Balol village into two village panchayats i.e. Balol Gram Panchayat and Laxmipura Gram Panchayat.

    3.1) The resolution dated 17th May, 2017 was forwarded to the respondent authorities. The District Development Officer made a proposal on 19th March, 2018 for division of Balol Gram Panchayat. On 20th March, 2018 the District Panchayat passed unanimous resolution passed on the basis of the proposal of the Balol Gram Panchayat for bifurcation. The District Development Officer by letter dated 12th October, 2018 sent all the record to the Development Commissioner for appropriate action.

3.2) The Development Commissioner by letter dated 26th October, 2018 returned the proposal stating that the resolution for the purpose of division of the Gram Panchayat is passed contrary to the Government Resolution dated 16th May, 2001 which provides that division of Gram Panchayat can be initiated only after the period of one year from the date on which the election gets over. As the resolution dated 17th May, 2017 was passed within the period of one year from the date of last election, fresh resolution to be passed by the Gram Panchayat was called for after one year of the date of last election. The office of the Development Commissioner further called for the declarations of the Sarpanch and members of the village Panchayat for their willingness to relinquish their posts as members of the Gram Panchayat and as the Sarpanch of the Balol Gram Panchayat.

3.3) On receipt of the letter from the Development Commissioner, the DDO by letter dated 29th October, 2018 informed the Taluka Development Officer that fresh resolution after the period of one year from the date of last election of the Gram Panchayat be called for bifurcation of Balol Gram Panchayat.

3.4) The Taluka Development Officer in turn by letter dated 1st November, 2018 informed the Sarpanch of the Balol Gram Panchayat to forward the resolution of the Gram Panchayat proposing to bifurcate the Balol Gram Panchayat into two different Gram Panchayats after the period of one year of last date of election of the village. It was also informed by the Taluka Development Officer that the declaration and willingness of Sarpanch and members to give-up their posts was also sought for in the form of declaration and undertakings.

3.5) It appears that on the basis of the letter of the Taluka Development Officer meeting of the Balol Gram Panchayat was convened on 8th January, 2019 wherein the members by majority votes did not opt for handing over the posts as Sarpanch and member of the Gram Panchayat and they did not agree to pass resolution for bifurcation of the Balol Gram Panchayat.

3.6) The Balol Gram Panchayat by letter dated 30th January, 2019 informed the Taluka Development Officer th

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top