BIREN VAISHNAV
NEAL TUSHAR VORA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By way of these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the communication by which the Corporation pursuant to the hearings inter se between the parties to the petition has observed that further action on the revised plans submitted by the respondent No.6 shall be taken, in accordance with the General Development Control Regulations, 2017 (for short, hereinafter referred to as `the GDCR, 2017’) by the Building Scrutiny Pool.
2. The lead matter for the purposes of this decision is Special Civil Application No.9408 of 2021. Prayers made in SCA No.9408 of 2021 read as under:
9(C) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to demolish any illegal construction including the structure for `Electrical Sub- Station’ built up on 3 level underground (Cellar) parking ramp forthwith and further be pleased direct the respondent authorities to not to permit the respondent developer to carry out construction and installation of `Electrical Sub-Station’ adjacent to residenc
K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Chief Officer
Dr. G.N. Khajuria v. Delhi Development Authority reported in 1995 (5) SCC 762
Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa reported in 2004 (8) SCC 733
Priyanka Estate International (P) Ltd. v. State of Assam reported in 2010 (2) SCC 27
Oryx Fisheries Private Limited v. Union of India (UOI) and others reported in 2010 (13) SCC 427
Kushuma Devi v. Sheopati Devi (Dead) and others reported in 2019 (5) SCC 744
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and others reported in 1991 (1) SCC 598
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar & Others (1976) 1 SCC 671
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.