NIKHIL S.KARIEL
JAGDISHBHAI PANCHABHAI SINDHAV – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned Advocate Mrs.Mamta Vyas on behalf of the petitioner and learned AGP Ms.Dharitri Pancholi on behalf of the respondent State.
2. Issue Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent State.
3. With the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.
4. By this petition, the petitioner challenges a decision of respondent No.2 of refusing to appoint the petitioner on the post of Armed Constable/Lok Rakshak only on the ground that the petitioner had been declared unfit in medical examination.
5. Learned Advocate Mrs.Vyas for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had been selected for the post of Lok Rakshak through the process conducted by the respondent Authorities vide an advertisement published in the year 2014-15, and whereas the petitioner had cleared both the written as well as physical examinations and after verification of all requisite documents, the petitioner had been placed in the waiting list and the said waiting list has been in operation. Mrs.Vays would submit that thereafter the petitioner was called for medical examination at Sr. T.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.