NIKHIL S.KARIEL
GAURAV JERAMBHA PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned Sr. Advocate Mr.G. M. Joshi appearing with learned Advocate Mr.Jay Thakkar on behalf of the petitioner and learned AGP Mr.Utkarsh Sharma on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. Issue Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives service of Rule. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final decision.
3. A very short but interesting and important question arises for consideration of this Court in this petition. The question being "in a departmental proceeding, when the Disciplinary Authority disagrees with the findings of the inquiry officer, would the charge-sheeted officer be entitled to a copy of such disagreement, in spite of the Rules governing the inquiry not specifically requiring the same."
4. Facts leading to filing of the present petition in brief are as under:-
Punjab National Bank and Ors. Vs. Kunjbhihari Mishra
Lav Nigam Vs. Chairman and M.D., ITI Limited and Anr.
Jiteshkumar Vallabhdas Chotai Vs. Principal District Judge and Disciplinary Authority, Rajkot & Anr.
Union Of India And Another vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayana
Punjab National Bank vs. K. K. Verma
State of Maharashtra v. B. K. Takkamore & Ors.
S. K. Singh v. Central Bank of India & Ors.
Haryana Financial Corporation and Anr. v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.