JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr.Sudhanshu Jha on behalf of the petitioner and learned AGP Ms.Dharitri Pancholi on behalf of the respondent State.

2. Issue Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent State.

3. With the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.

4. By this petition, the petitioner challenges a decision of respondents, refusing to appoint the petitioner on the post of Jail Sepoy/Lok Rakshak only on the ground that the petitioner had been declared unfit in medical examination.

5. Learned Advocate Mr.Jha for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had been selected for the post of Lok Rakshak through the process conducted by the respondent Authorities vide an advertisement published in the year 2016-17, and whereas the petitioner had cleared both the written as well as physical examinations and after verification of all requisite documents, the petitioner had been placed in the waiting/select list and the said waiting/select list has been in operation. Mr.Jha would submit that thereafter the petitioner was called for medical examination at Jamnab