JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr.Swapneshwar Gautam learned advocate for the petitioner. He makes a statement that as far as prayers 7C and 7E are concerned, he would make a representation to the appropriate authority for a relief claimed therein.

2. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr.Meet Thakkar waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents.

3. As far as prayer 7B is concerned, this Court vide decision dated 02.02.2022 rendered in Special Civil Application No.6973 of 2019, held that the petitioners therein are entitled to the first higher grade pay scale of Rs.2000-3500/-.

4. The judgment dated 02.02.2022 rendered in Special Civil Application No.6973 of 2019 the directions given therein shall govern the case of the petitioner.

The relevant paragraphs read as under:

"7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for the respective parties and considering the dates of appointment on which the petitioners were appointed as Mukhya Sevikas which is evident from the schedule that the learned AGP has referred to in the affidavit-in-reply at Annexure R1, what clearly emerges is that the petitioners are appointed initially in the year 1982. A few of the petitioners were appointed in the ye