JUDGMENT :

Bhargav D. Karia, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Sangeeta Pahwa for the petitioners, learned advocate Mr. R.D. Kinariwala for respondent nos. 3 and 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya for respondent nos. 1 and 2 through video conference.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 and learned advocate Mr. R.D. Kinariwala waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4.

3. The controversy arising in this petition is in a very narrow compass and therefore, with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, same is taken up for hearing today.

4. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 27th April, 2015 passed by the Mamlatdar, Surat city, Katargam, Surat cancelling Entry No. 10877 without any notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioners only on the ground that this Court has not given any direction to make an entry of lis pendens in the revenue record while passing the order in Civil Application No. 5564 of