IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Gita Gopi, J.
Mohsin Salimbhai Qureshi - Appellant
Vs.
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application No. 91 of 2022
Decided On : 07-03-2022
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 437, 439 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 120(B) - Central Goods & Services Act, 2017 - Sections 6, 16(2)[(b) & (c), 35, 67, 69, 69(1), 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) r/w 132(1)(i) and section 132(5) - Criminal Conspiracy - Officers of Directorate General, which works under Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs (CBIC) under Ministry of Finance, Government of India, had got intelligence that certain firms were operating only on paper and passing on inadmissible Input Tax Credit by issuing invoices only, without any actual supply of goods mentioned therein - Held, Section 132(1)(i) provides for punishment as that 'in cases where amount of tax evaded or amount of input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised or amount of refund wrongly taken exceeds five hundred lakh rupees, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine; and section 132(2) provides that, where any person convicted of an offence under this section is again convicted of an offence under this section, then, he shall be punishable for second and for every subsequent offence with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine - Section 138 of Act makes provision for compounding of offences under Act, even after institution of prosecution, on payment by person accused of offence, such compounding amount in such manner as may be prescribed - Compounding shall be allowed only after making payment of tax, interest and penalty involved in such offences, on payment of compounding amount as may be determined by commissioner, criminal proceeding already initiated in respect of said offence shall stand abated - Taking into consideration provisions of law and fact that Commissioner is empower to recover due amount and propose for abating proceedings and as trial will take its own time to conclude, this Court finds this to be a fit case where discretion could be exercised in favour of applicant - Application is allowed.
JUDGMENT/ORDER :
1. The present application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with the offence being File No.DGGI/AZU/Gr.E/12(4)510/2020-21 registered with the office of DGGI, AZU, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) read with section 132(1)(i) and section 132(5) of the Central Goods & Services Act, 2017 and section 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) read with section 132(1)(i) and section 132(5) of the Gujarat GST Act, 2017 and section 120(B) of the IPC.
2. The facts arising out of the said case in nutshell, are narrated hereinbelow:
2.2 It is stated in the memo of arrest that as per the investigation two firms under the proprietorship of the present applicant - Mohsin Salimbhai Qureshi namely M/s. Alina Traders and M/s. Galaxy Traders have availed and utilised ITC of Rs.8.18 crore and Rs.2.11 crore respectively on the basis of invoices issued by M/s. S.K. Traders, which is non-existing firm which in turn received Rs.10.36 crore from another non-existent firm i.e. M/s. Ronak Traders which has no GSTR-2A, without receipt of goods mentioned therein and since the entire payment has been made through utilisation of ITC which was not legally available to both these firms, and therefore no tax has been paid in respect of the invoices issued by these two firms and therefore the availment of ITC of Rs.10.29 crore was not admissible as per section 16(2)[(b) & (c)] of CGST Act, 2017.
2.3 The applicant was arrested on 01.09.2021 under the provisions of section 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and produced before the Court of Additional Chief metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad, thereby he was sent in judicial custody. The applicant thereafter preferred bail application under the provisions of section 437 of the Code before the court of learned Magistrate, which came to be rejected vide order dated 14.09.2021. Against the same, the applicant approached the Court of learned City & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad by preferring Criminal Misc. Application No.7105 of 2021, however, the same also came to be rejected vide judgment and order dated 11.10.2021.
2.4 It is stated that, after completion of investigation in connection with the present offence, a complaint came to be filed before the Court of learned Magistrate on 29.10.2021 for the offences punishable under sections 132(1)(b), 132(1(c) read with section 132(1)(i) & 132(5) of the CGST, 2017 and section 132(1)
(b), 132(1)(c) read with section 132(1)(i) & 132(5) of the Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.