SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 341

R.M.CHHAYA, NIRAL R.MEHTA
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Katariya Enterprise – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Vibhuti Nanavati, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mahendra U. Vora, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

R.M. Chhaya, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and award dated 22.12.2016 passed by the MAC Tribunal (Aux.) Ahmedabad (Rural) in MAC Petition No. 516 of 2006, the appellant-Insurance Co. has preferred this Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act').

2. The following facts emerge from the record of the Appeal:

2.1. That the accident took place on 13.2.2006 near Chotila-Sayala crossing of Limbdi-Ahmedabad Highway. It is the case of the respondents-claimants that the deceased Dr. R.J.S. Yadav along with one Mr. R.D. Patel were traveling in Maruti Car from Rajkot to Ahmedabad and when the car reached at the place of occurrence at about 4.00 a.m., the accident occurred. It is the case of the claimants that the car was parked properly and the deceased got down from the car to answer the nature's call and while he was returning, the truck bearing registration No. GJ-3-W-9390 coming from Sayala being driven in rash and negligent manner, ran over the deceased. The record indicates that the deceased susta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top