NISHA M.THAKORE
Navinbhai Hirabhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Mr. Kishan Prajapati, learned advocate states that he has received instructions to appear for and on behalf of the original complainant-respondent No.2 and he shall file his Vakalatnama before the Registry. Registry shall accept the same.
2. Rule. Ms. M.H. Bhatt, learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1-State.Mr. Kishan Prajapati, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the original complainant -respondent No.2.
3. By way of present application, the applicant has requested to take the settlement on record and compound the offence by quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 18.4.2022 passed below Ex. 25 in Criminal Case No.622 of 2021 by learned 7th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gandhinagar and acquit the applicant.
4. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned advocates for the respective parties jointly submitted that the dispute between the parties is settled amicably.
5. Learned advocate for the respondent no.2 further submitted that original complainant-respondent No.2 is personally present before this Court and he is identified by him. The original complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.