SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 518

ILESH J.VORA
MAHENDRABHAI GANAPATBHAI PAGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : JAY R. SHAH.
For the Respondent: MANAN MEHTA.

ORDER :

1. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. Learned advocate Mr. Sunil H. Purohit states that he has an instructions to appear for the respondent No. 2- complainant. He is permitted to file his appearance forthwith.

2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well as learned advocate appearing for the Complainant waive service of Rule on behalf of the respective respondents.

3. Considering the issue involved in the present application and with consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the fact that the dispute amongst the applicant and respondent No. 2 has been resolved amicably, this application is taken up for final disposal forthwith.

4. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code”) the applicant has prayed for quashing and setting aside F.I.R. bearing CR-I/11207061210420/2021 registered with Shahera Police Station, District Panchmahals for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR qua the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top