ILESH J.VORA
MAHENDRABHAI GANAPATBHAI PAGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. Learned advocate Mr. Sunil H. Purohit states that he has an instructions to appear for the respondent No. 2- complainant. He is permitted to file his appearance forthwith.
2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well as learned advocate appearing for the Complainant waive service of Rule on behalf of the respective respondents.
3. Considering the issue involved in the present application and with consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the fact that the dispute amongst the applicant and respondent No. 2 has been resolved amicably, this application is taken up for final disposal forthwith.
4. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code”) the applicant has prayed for quashing and setting aside F.I.R. bearing CR-I/11207061210420/2021 registered with Shahera Police Station, District Panchmahals for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR qua the ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.