BHARGAV D.KARIA
Pravinchandra Ishverlal Singapuri – Appellant
Versus
Authorized Officer Of DCB Bank Limited – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned advocate Ms.Zainab I. Bharmal for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Lalit M. Patel for the respondent No.1.
2. Learned advocate Ms.Bharmal has tendered a draft amendment. The same is allowed in terms of the draft. To be carried out forthwith.
3. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :
(B) That the pending hearing and final disposal of this petition, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to restrain respondent no.4 and 5 from creating further any right title or interest in the mortgaged property;
(C) That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the DRT to expedite the hearing of the Securitization Application.
(Cl). That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside all the Section 13(4) measures initiated by the respondent No.1-Bank in respect of the secured asset of the petitioner and direct the respondents to release the secu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.