BIREN VAISHNAV
Bhaskarray Premshankar Jani – Appellant
Versus
Director Of Pension And Provident Fund – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr.G.M.Amin learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for a direction to fix the pension and pensionary benefits of the petitioner. The order under challenge is that of the Gujarat Water Resources Development Corporation of year 2019 which indicates that the petitioner’s services were for nine years, four months and 13 days and therefore the petitioner is not entitled to the benefits of pension.
3. Mr.Amin learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was initially appointed on 01.06.1972 with the respondent no.1 District Panchayat on creation of the Corporation in the year 1978. Employees from the different departments including that of the Panchayat were brought to the Corporation on 16.06.1978 by way of en block transfer. No options were invited from the employees who have been transferred and therefore the State Government issued a circular on 14.10.1981 inviting options from the employees transferred to the Corporation. The petitioner served the Corporation till 31.03.2001. He was not given any option for the services rendered with the previous emplo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.