SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BIREN VAISHNAV, J.
Upadhyay Parulben Anandbhai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 12110 of 2021
Decided on : 01-04-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR SP MAJMUDAR, ULLASH N GOHIL
For the Respondent: MR.KRUTIK PARIKH

Interpretation of circulars and resolutions related to GPF and the continuity of GPF benefit upon transition from Ad-Hoc to regular employee.

Headnote:

GPF - Government Pension Fund - Circular dated 20.09.1975, Circular dated 29.05.1988, Government Resolution dated 18.03.2005, Amendment dated 06.09.2005, Government Resolution dated 03.07.1998 - The court allowed the petition, quashed the orders discontinuing the GPF benefit, and directed the deduction of GPF contribution from the petitioner's salary based on the interpretation of relevant circulars and resolutions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, appointed as an Ad-Hoc Lecturer in 1997, had a GPF account opened as per prevailing rules. After being appointed as the Head of the Department in 2006, the benefit of the GPF account was discontinued based on the Government Resolution dated 18.03.2005.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petition, quashed the orders discontinuing the GPF benefit, and directed the deduction of GPF contribution from the petitioner's salary based on the interpretation of relevant circulars and resolutions.

Issues: Discontinuance of GPF benefit, interpretation of circulars and resolutions related to GPF, continuity of GPF benefit upon transition from Ad-Hoc to regular employee.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the circulars and resolutions to conclude that the petitioner's GPF benefit should continue without any break upon transition from Ad-Hoc to regular employee.

Final Decision: The petition is allowed, the orders discontinuing the GPF benefit are quashed, and the respondents are directed to deduct the contribution of the GPF from the petitioner's salary.

JUDGMENT :

1. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr.Krutik Parikh learned AGP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent State.

2. With the consent of learned advocates for the respective parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.

3. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing and settings aside the orders dated 20.11.2018, 09.10.2019, 10.07.2020 and 19.08.2020, holding that the discontinuance of the benefit of GPF is bad.

4. At the outset, it is pointed out that the issue is covered by a decision of this Court in Special Civil Application No.7522 of 2020.

5. The above order passed was confirmed by the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.147 of 2022 dated 22.03.2022.

6. Reading the decision of the coordinate bench of this Court dated 16.06.2021 rendered in Special Civil Application No.7522 of 2020, for the purposes of disposal of the present petition, it will be apt to reproduce the relevant portion of the order of the coordinate bench, which reads as under:

    “[7] The facts which are relevant and not in dispute are that the petitioner was appointed as Ad-Hoc Lecturer in Computer Engineering Department on 25.03.1997. During his employment as Ad-Hoc employee, the GPF Account of the petitioner was opened as per the prevailing rules pertaining to the GPF under Circular dated 20.09.1975 issued by the Finance Department as well as Circular dated 29.05.1988 again issued by the Finance Department. Both these provide for opening of GPF Account compulsory for those Government servants/officers who though may not be permanent, but have put in three years of continuous service. The petitioner thereafter, faced selection procedure and after successfully cleared the selection procedure by the GPSC was appointed against the regular post of the very Department as the Head of the Department w.e.f. 25.09.2006. The relevant portion of the Government Resolution dated 18.03.2005 and Clause-3 read as under:- “Announcement was made in the budget of the year 2003- 04 in the parliament to insert new structure known as Defined Pension Scheme for the new candidates recruited in the service of central government and towards the first step of its implementation, the Government of India introduced a New Defined Contribution Pension Scheme for its employees (Except armed forces) w.e.f. 01/01/2004. The Government of India has formed interim scheme for implementation of the said scheme as detailed rules and regulations are yet to be formed. At the end of careful consideration, as it was decided to implement the said new defined pension scheme (NEW DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION SCHEME) w.e.f. 01st April, 2005, New Defined Pension Scheme shall be applicable to the employees appointed on or after 01st April, 2005 as mentioned hereunder

“Clause-3 The employees who have been appointed with respect to the Monthly Lump Sum Pay Policy implemented by the State Government and the employees who shall be appointed on or after 01/04/2005 in the regular pay scale.”

[8] The amendment to the Government Resolution dated 18.03.2005 issued by the Finance Department on 06.09.2005 would read as under:-.

“New Pension Scheme becomes applicable vide 18/03/2005 cited at Preamble (1) to the employees of the State Government recruited on or after 01/04/2005. But as per the Orders of the Government of India cited at Sr.(2) of the preamble, the employees who have been in the service of the state government prior to the date of implementation of new pension scheme i.e. 01/04/2005 and are entitled to the benefit of the pension scheme pursuant to their original appointment / service, if such employees/officers get selected and appointed on new post in the government on or after 01/04/2005 by direct recruitment from their original appointment/service by recognized process and if they required to tender resignation for technical reasons to join new appointment, present scheme (Pensions Scheme of

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top