ASHOKKUMAR C.JOSHI
Rajesh Purushottam Chaturanithrough His Power of Attorney Prakash Hirji Hadiya – Appellant
Versus
Bhikhalal Samarthaji Parmar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Learned advocate Mr. Y.N. Ravani with learned advocate Mr. Raju K. Kothari for the respondent. With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.
2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner praying for to quash and set aside the judgment and order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Gandhidham – Kachchh in Civil Misc. Application No. 39 of 2016 and to condone the delay of 151 days in filing the appeal.
3. Heard, learned advocate Mr. Tirth Bhatt for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Y. N. Ravani with learned advocate Mr. Raju K. Kothari for the respondent.
3.1 The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wanted to challenge the judgment and decree passed against him by filing the appeal, however, as there was delay in filing the appeal, the petitioner preferred an application for condonation of delay, however, the said application came to be rejected by the impugned order and hence, the petitioner is before this Court by this writ petition. The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted tha
Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India
Dwarka Prasad Agarwal (D) by Lrs. and Another v. B.D. Agarwal and Others
Bhagubhai Dhanabhai Khalasi & Anr. v. The State of Gujarat & Ors.
Jai Narain Parasrampuria (Dead) and Others v. Pushpa Devi Saraf and Others
Ram Nath Sao Alias Ram Nath Sahu and Ors. v. Gobardhan Sao and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.