VAIBHAVI D.NANAVATI
MONIKABEN CHETANBHAI GONDALIYA – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATH, SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (EAST ZONE A, VARACHHA) – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of this writ-petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicants is challenging the communication dated 15.07.2021, by which the respondent authority refused to make changes as sought for by the writapplicants. The writ-applicants had approached the respondent authority by making a representation dated 12.07.2021 seeking change in the name of the petitioner no.2 in the column of ‘father name’ as ‘Chetan Dhirubhai Gondaliya’ in place of ‘Vrushabhbhai Jaysukhbhai Kathrotiya’ in the birth certificate of girl of the petitioners, viz. ‘Maitri'.
2. The respondent authority refused the said application preferred by the writ-applicants dated 12.07.2021 by the impugned order dated 15.07.2021. The respondent authority rejected the application seeking the aforesaid change on the ground that the respondent authority would not exercise any power to carry-out any correction in the birth certificate in light of the certain notifications and resolutions by the State Government.
3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid order refusing to make correction in the birth certificate of the daughter- ‘Maitri’ by mentioning the name of the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.