IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D.KARIA, J.
Ambe Public School - Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat - Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 2356 of 2021
Decided on : 22-07-2022
Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 – Sections 2(r), 8(2)(b), 10(1), 3(4) – Recovery in excess of fees – Fee Regulatory Committee – All these petitions are filed by Self Financed schools challenging orders passed by Fee Regulatory Committee (Self- Finance Schools) and/or Fee Revision Committee under provisions of Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 and the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Rules, 2017 – Held, FRC is therefore, required to adhere to aforesaid observations/guidelines/suggestions while determining fees – State Government may also frame a policy providing such guidelines to achieve objects of the Act, 2017 which would require all different FRCs to adopt a uniform approach for determination of fees to be charged by Self Financed School – View of above foregoing reasons, impugned orders passed by FRC as well as Fee Revision Committee are hereby quashed and set aside and matters are remanded back to FRC to decide fee proposals afresh – FRC is directed to reconsider each case by permitting school to present their case and decide fee proposal submitted by each school de novo and in meanwhile schools are permitted to charge fees as they are charging at present till such exercise is over by FRC. FRC shall complete determination of fees of schools in this group of petitions within a period of 12 weeks from date of receipt of this order – Petitions disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
1.
I- Introduction
All these petitions are filed by the Self Financed schools challenging the orders passed by the Fee Regulatory Committee (Self- Finance Schools) and/or Fee Revision Committee under the provisions of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 (For short "the Act, 2017") and the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Rules, 2017(for short "Rules, 2017").
2. With the consent of the learned advocates, these petitions are heard finally and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order as the issues arising in these petitions are more or less similar.
3. The constitutional validity of the Act, 2017 was challenged before this Court by filing Writ Petition (PIL) No. 132 of 2017 and other similar petitions. The Division Bench of this Court (Coram : Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr. R. Subhash Reddy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi) by judgment and order dated 27th December, 2017 upheld the constitutional validity of the Act, 2017 by arriving at the following conclusion on various issues raised by the petitioner therein:
(A) The respondent State has legislative competence to enact the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 and the Rules framed thereunder, including for the schools affiliated to CBSC, ICSE and IB and the provisions of said Act and Rules framed thereunder are also not repugnant to the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
(B) Sections 2(g), 2(r), 2(t), 2(u), 3, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 and the Rules 6,7 and 8 and Form II and its Annexures of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Rules, 2017 are not violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and the various restrictions in the above said provisions of the Act and Rules framed thereunder are reasonable restrictions, within the meaning of Article 19(6) of the Constitution of India.
(C) The provisions of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 and the Rules framed thereunder are not violative of the rights guaranteed under Article 30 of the Constitution of India with regard to the minority institutions.
(D) Constitution of Fee Regulatory Committee, and Fee Revision Committee under Sections 3 and 12 of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 are not unconstitutional, as contended by the petitioners.
(E) Provisions of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 and the Rules framed thereunder are not retrospective in nature, as pleaded by the petitioners.
(F) Notification dated 25.04.2017 issued section 9(1) of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 is valid. However, we permit the Association of various categories of schools to file representation to the Competent Authority within a period of six weeks from today for modification of exemption limit notified in the notification. If such representations are filed, the Competent Authority to consider such representations and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks thereafter. If the Competent Authority comes to the conclusion that exemption limit is required to be revised, it shall take necessary steps to issue necessary notification by publication in official gazette and same would be effective from the academic year 2018-19.
(G) We further make it clear that it is open to the Self Financed Schools which are required to submit proposal in Form II to the Fee Regulatory Committee for fixation of fees to propose fees not restricting to various types of fees notified under section 2(g) of the Gujarat Self Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 or type of income show
The FRC, as a quasi-judicial authority, must follow the provisions of the Act and Rules, conduct individual case inquiry, and apply principles of natural justice.
The Court emphasized the importance of complying with the legal provisions under the Gujarat Self-Financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 and the Rules'2017, particularly in the context of th....
The Fee Committee exceeded its jurisdiction by adjudicating complaints post-enactment of the Punjab Regulation of Fee of Unaided Educational Institutions Act, 2016, leading to the quashing of its ord....
(1) Director, Secondary Education has no authority to issue direction in respect of fee structure in respect of private unaided schools.(2) It is for school Management to reschedule payment of school....
Private educational institutions can set their own fee structures, provided they do not engage in profiteering or capitation fees, adhering to principles established in precedential Supreme Court cas....
Unaided recognized schools - Prohibition for not collecting part of annual charges not justified – School dependent only on fees collected to cover their salary, establishment and all other expenditu....
Point of law: The right to establish an educational institution can be regulated; but such regulatory measures must, in general, be to ensure the maintenance of proper academic standards, atmosphere ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.