SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1217

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
VIMLABEN NILESHBHAI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HEIRS – Appellant
Versus
KOLI KALU MALA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : HEMAL SHAH.
For the Respondents: G.C. MAZMUDAR, H.G. MAZMUDAR.

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment and award dated 29.01.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Morvi (hereinafter be referred to as the “Tribunal”) in M.A.C.P. No. 177 of 1994, the legal heir of deceased Vimlaben has preferred the present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1994.

2. Following facts emerge from the record of the case:

    2.1 That the deceased Vimlaben was travelling in the jeep bearing registration No. GJR-3677 from Wankaner along with other persons and at about 7.30 p.m. when the jeep reached near Ambika Petrol Pump near the signboard of Village Rafaleshwar on Wankaner Morvi National Highway, at that time, tanker bearing registration No. GTX-8970 came from opposite direction in rash and negligent manner and in excessive speed, due to which, the driver of the tanker lost control over the vehicle dashed with the jeep and as a result of which, the deceased succumbed to the injury. Hence, the legal heir of deceased Vimlaben filed claim petition before the Tribunal claiming c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top