IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
DUDHIBEN BHAGWANBHAI ASODARIYA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION IRRIGATION – Respondent
First Appeal Nos. 3703, 3705, 3757, 3760 of 2022
Decided On : 04-10-2022
Land Acquisition Act - Compensation Determination - Section 4
Fact of the Case:
The court considered the issue of compensation determination under the Land Acquisition Act for the Vadi Irrigation Project. The notifications under Section 4 of the Act were issued on varying dates between 1996 and 2006. The Division Bench had previously determined the market value of the lands and awarded compensation based on the notifications.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the appeals and determined the additional compensation based on the market value of the lands as previously determined by the Division Bench. The acquiring body was directed to deposit the determined compensation within 3 months, with further interest if not disbursed within 5 months.
Issues: Compensation determination based on notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the previous determination of market value and compensation by the Division Bench based on the notifications under Section 4 of the Act.
Final Decision: The appeals were allowed, and the acquiring body was directed to deposit the determined compensation within 3 months, with further interest if not disbursed within 5 months.
ORDER :
1. Mr. Utsav Parikh, learned advocate for the appellants has submitted that the issues raised in the aforementioned appeals are squarely covered the judgment dated 07.08.2018 passed by the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in First Appeal No. 2825 of 2012 and allied matters.
2. Mr. Parikh, learned advocate has submitted that so far as First Appeal Nos. 3705 of 2022 and 3757 of 2022 are concerned, Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act issued on 15.04.2006 and for the period of 2 years, the Court has to determine the compensation before the Division Bench. Notification issued under Section 4 of the Act was issued in the group of appeals between 01.02.1996 to 06.06.1996 and 19.01.2004. He has further submitted that so far as First Appeal No. 3703 of 2022 is concerned, Notification under Section 4 of the Act was published on 19.01.2004 and so far as First Appeal No. 3760 of 2022 is concerned, Notification issued under Section 4 notification has been issued on 01.05.1996.
It is submitted that the land acquired in the present Reference proceedings is of village Mangvapal Amarpur (Varudi), which was also the subject matter for consideration by the Division Bench. It is also submitted that very same irrigation project situated in Amreli Taluka, Amreli District in respect of lands acquired for the public purpose of Vadi Irrigation Project. He has further submitted that after considering the various appeals as finally determined the amount of compensation, which may be followed in the First Appeal.
3. Mr. Barot, learned AGP appearing on behalf of the respondent authorities has submitted that the acquiring body is unable to dispute that the Division Bench has already considered the issue of the land acquired in the aforesaid village which is the subject matter. However, he has further submitted that so far as First Appeal Nos. 3705 of 2022 and 3757 of 2022 are concerned, this Court may not enhance the market value.
4. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.
5. It is not in dispute that for the village situated in Amreli Taluka and Amreli District in respect of land was acquired for the public purpose for Vadi Irrigation Project, for which, Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was published between 1st February, 1996 to 16th June, 1996 and on 19th January, 2004. The Division Bench of this Court by way of First Appeals filed by the claimants in the same very village, delivered the judgment appreciating the oral as well as documentary evidence and observed and held in paragraphs 66, 67, 68 and 69, which is as under:
67. The Reference Court has awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 20/- per square metre for jirayat land and Rs. 30/- per square metre for bagayat land. The appellants would therefore be entitled to additional compensation of Rs. 45/- per square metre (Rs. 65.00 - Rs. 20.00) for jirayat land and Rs. 67.50 per square metre (Rs. 97.50 - Rs. 30.00) for bagayat land.
68. Insofar as First Appeals No. 1546 of 2018 to 1550 of 2018, First Appeals No. 1552 of 2018 to 1559 of 2018 and First Appeal No. 1561 of 2018 are concerned, the notification under section 4 of the Act came to be published on 19.01.2004. Since this court
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of fair compensation for acquired lands based on the prevailing market rate and the evidence presented to establish the market va....
While determining market value/compensation, previous instances of acquisition in proximity for location and potential of land acquisition along with cumulative increase is relevant consideration.
Acquisition of land – Though appreciation in price can be presumed, but market value cannot be assessed by applying suitable deduction in market value of land acquired by a subsequent notification.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that compensation under the Land Acquisition Act cannot be determined based on subsequent notifications for different villages, and the court must ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.