ARAVIND KUMAR, ASHUTOSH SHASTRI
Royal Transport Contractor – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aravind Kumar, J.
1. Heard Shri Nisarg P. Raval, learned counsel appearing for petitioner, Shri Jal Soli Unwalla, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 and Ms. Shrunjal Shah, learned AGP appearing for respondent No. 2.
2. Respondent No. 2 invited a tender on 28.05.2020 for supply of essential commodities by transporters namely to supply the essential commodities to Fair Price Shops at Panchmahal under doorstep delivery scheme. Petitioner participated in the said bid process and was declared as L-1 bidder, or in other words, the bid offered by petitioner was accepted for Panchmahal District and work order came to be issued on 07.08.2020. Pursuant to same, agreement came to be entered into between petitioner and respondent on the same date. On a surprise check to the godown made by inspecting authorities, resulting in said team finding deficit stock in the godown which was huge quantity and as such a police complaint came to be lodged resulting in FIR No. 11207061210114 being registered for the offence punishable under 406, 420, 409, 120-B of IPC, read with Section 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and Section 13(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.