IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BIREN VAISHNAV, J.
Amish Sureshchandra Desai – Petitioner
Versus
Sadhu Shri Premswaroopdasji – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 2749 Of 2023
Decided On : 21-02-2023
Constitution of the India,1950 - Articles 226 and 227 - Gujarat Public Trust Act, 1950 - Section 41(A) - Application - Property of trust - Challenged the order - Held, entire foundation to the right to reside at two places fructified out of an interim arrangement pursuant to petition invoking article 226 of Constitution of India by a writ of Habeas Corpus - Though observations thereunder may not be binding, Court distinctly opined that there was no pleading even in petition and in fact it was a petition with no other agenda except attempting freedom of petitioners and/or their representatives - Perusal of orders impugned therefore indicates that the Joint Charity Commissioner, in words of this Court, was well aware and did guard herself so as not to travel into prohibited territory of decision making process and to issue directions deciding a dispute for pronouncing upon the rights of the parties, the line of demarcation between the two functions often becomes thin and slippery - Petition is dismissed
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Respective learned advocates waive service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the concerned respondents.
2. In this petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of the India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 08.02.2023 below Exh.5 in Judicial Misc. Application No.60 of 2022. The order was passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Vadodara.
3. The facts in brief indicate that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 are Sahishnus and have renounced their world for the purpose of following the path of Swaminarayan under the able guidance of Sadhu Shri Hariprasad Dasji.
- An application under the provisions of Section 41(A) of Gujarat Public Trust Act, 1950 (for short, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) was filed by the petitioners. It was their case that the respondents are trustees of two trusts namely; Yogi Divine Society and Shri Hari Ashram Trust. The basic motto of these trusts was to impart education and spread religion amongst the society and the applicants have approached the Joint Charity Commissioner with a prayer that the Joint Charity Commissioner be pleased to declare that the Sadhus and Sadhvijis are an integral part of the trust and are entitled to have a place of residence at any property owned by the trust. An application with a similar prayer with interim relief was prayed for. By the impugned order, dated 8.2.2023, the application Exh.5 of the petitioners came to be rejected.
4. Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior Counsel and Mr. Percy Kavina, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. C. B. Upadhyaya, learned advocate have appeared for the petitioners. They made the following submissions.
- Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior Counsel would further invite the attention of the Court to the trust deed of the Yogi Divine Trust and that of Hari Ashram Trust, Sokhda. He would submit that reading the objects of the trust would indicate that it has been established for the purpose of setting up and organize educational institution with technical base. A special emphasise was made by Shri Thakore on the objects which provide that that the society would make known to the neighbours and people in general, the aims and ideals of life, the system of Yoga of totally secular nature and also to start and run bhojnalayas for Sadhus and devotees.
- Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior Counsel would submit that having renounced the world and having surrendered themselves to propagate and promote the objectives as narrated hereinabove and also when the settler of the Swaminarayan Sampraday was desirous of establishing, maintaining and aiding temples, bhojnalayas for Sadhus and Satsangees, right of a residence in the properties of the trust of which they were an integral part was a matter directly connected with the administration of the trust.
- Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior Counsel would invite the Court’s attention, briefly, to the controversy with regard to the litigation pending with regard to the change report filed by the respondent No.1 based on which he claimed to be the President of the trust. He wo
In Re Special Reference No. 1 of 2012
Mehboob Dawood Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra reported in (2004) 2 SCC 362
Section 2(13) of the Trusts Act when the petitioner Society is registered under the Societies Registration Act and the same is registered for charitable purposes, it is deemed to be a charitable Trus....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Charity Commissioner's decision to grant consent for instituting the civil suit was based on subjective satisfaction and fulfilled all pro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the directions issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner to enroll new members were without jurisdiction and in violation of Article 19(1)(c) o....
Trustees must comply with legal requirements for property management; failure to do so constitutes serious misconduct warranting removal.
The exercise of jurisdiction under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, by the Charity Commissioner is subject to specific conditions precedent, including the absence of a validly c....
The supervisory authority’s power under the act to issue directions for 'proper administration' is restricted to the protection and management of trust property and income. It does not empower the au....
Trustees of public charitable trusts do not require Charity Commissioner consent to file suits for recovering possession from trespassers, affirming their inherent rights as legal owners.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.