ARAVIND KUMAR, ASHUTOSH SHASTRI, NISHA M. THAKORE
Ambuja Cements Limited – Appellant
Versus
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARAVIND KUMAR, J.
1. These stamp references are made under Section 54(1A) of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Stamp Act’) by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar for the opinion of this Court.
2. Though questions of law in each of this stamp reference would overlap, the facts in each case and would differ partially and as such, the facts are narrated independently and the questions of law are dealt with collectively.
RE: STAMP REFERENCE No. 1 OF 2020
3. A scheme of amalgamation between Holcim (India) Private Limited with Ambuja Cement Limited was presented before this Court for sanctioning the said scheme. The said scheme came to be sanctioned by the Company Court i.e. High Court of Gujarat on 18.3.2014 and pursuant to the same, the applicant – Ambuja Cement Limited filed an application dated 15.5.2014 before the Collector under provisions of Section 31(1) of the Stamp Act seeking opinion as to proper stamp duty leviable on the order of sanction of the scheme by the Company Court. The Collector, by order dated 26.
K. Jagadeesan vs. Union of India [(1990) 2 SCC 231]
Lokmat Newspapers (P) Ltd. v. Shankarprasad
Swedish Match AB v. Securities and Exchange Board, India
H.H. Shri Vishwesha Thirtha Swaminar and others v. State of Mysore and Anr.
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes v. Bajaj Auto Limited reported in 2016 (16) SCC 83.
Pirbhai Janubhai Shaikh v. B.R. Manepatil
Nagpur Electric Light and Power Company Limited v. Regional Director
Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Meerut v. Sharvan Kumar Swarup & Sons
Hira Lal Rattanlal vs. State of U.P. [(1973) 1 SCC 216]
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited vs. Union of India [(2019) 8 SCC 416]
The Member, Board of Revenue v/s Arthur Paul Benthall
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Patiala v/s. M/s. Shahzada Nand and Sons and others
Union of India vs. Manraj Enterprises [(2022) 2 SCC 331
Aphali Pharmaceuticals Limited vs. State of Maharashtra [(1989) 4 SCC 378]
Aakash Laviesh Leisure Private Limited v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Berger Paints (India) Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [(2017) 13 SCC 726]
Board of Revenue v. Rai Saheb Siddnath Mehrotra reported in (1965)2 SCR 269 : AIR 1965 SC 1092;
Board of Revenue vs. Arthur Paul Benthall
Chief Controlling Authority v. Nutal Mills Limited
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority vs. Coastal Gujarat Power Limited and others
Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. M/s. Calcutta Knitwears [(2014) 6 SCC 444]
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad v. Solid and Correct Engineering Works and Ors.
Board of Revenue, U.P. v/s Electronic Industries of India
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v/s Coastal Gujarat Power Limited and others
District Registrar and Collector v. Canara Bank reported in (2005)1 SCC 496;
Eera (through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf) v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr. (2017) 15 SCC 133
Federation of A.P. Chambers of Commerce & Industry and others v/s State of A.P. and others
Government of Uttar Pradesh vs. Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmed Khan
Hindustan Lever and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another reported in (2004) 9 SCC 438.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.