JUDGMENT :

1. The present petition is filed by being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 10.10.2022 passed by the respondent – society, by which, the services of the petitioner is terminated, and therefore, the petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. Brief facts of the case are as such that the petitioner made an application on 26.08.2019 for appointment as a Principal of Anandalaya Education Society. It is the case of the petitioner that the necessary selection procedures were conducted on 30.11.2019 and 01.12.2019. Consequent to that, the petitioner was selected and appointed as Principal of the college, which is run by the respondent. He was appointed by appointment letter dated 03.12.2019. It is further the case of the petitioner that the letter of appointment states that the petitioner was appointed on probation basis for a period of one year and subsequently by office order dated 29.12.2020, the respondent has confirmed the services of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that various allegations were made against the petitioner and consequently departmental proceedings were initiated, and thereafter