A. S. SUPEHIA, M. R. MENGDEY
Ghanshyambhai @ Haresh Madhabhai Mori Through Mori Vanitaben Ghanshyambhai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. R. MENGDEY, J.
1. Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present petition is directed against order of detention dated 23.06.2023 passed by the respondent – detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short “the Act”) by detaining the petitioner – detenue as defined under section 2(b) of the Act.
3. Learned advocate for the detenue submits that the order of detention impugned in this petition deserves to be quashed and set aside on the ground of registration of the FIR for the offences under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116B of the Prohibition Act by itself cannot bring the case of the detenu within the purview of definition under section 2(b) of the Act. Learned advocate for the petitioner further submitted that illegal activity likely to be carried out or alleged to have been carried out, as alleged, cannot have any nexus or bearing with the maintenance of public order and at the most, it can be said to be breach of law and order. Further, except statement of witnesses, registration of above FIR/s, no other relevant and cogent material
Mallada K. Sri Ram Vs. The State of Telangana & Ors. 2022 6 SCALE 50
Pushker Mukherjee v/s. State of West Bengal
Ram Manohar Lohia Vs. State of Bihar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'law and order' and 'public order' as it pertains to the application of preventive detention laws, emphasizing that every d....
Mere registration of FIRs does not necessarily indicate a breach of public order, and preventive detention laws should be applied with strict adherence to lawful standards.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of FIR alone does not establish a nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order as required by the Gujarat Prevention ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a disturbance to the community at large to constitute a breach of public order under the Prevention of Anti Social Activities A....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the mere registration of FIRs does not necessarily constitute a breach of public order as required under the Prevention of Anti Social Activit....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the mere registration of FIRs does not necessarily constitute a breach of public order as required under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of FIRs alone does not establish a nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order, and material circumstances are neces....
The main legal point established is that preventive detention under the Act requires material showing a threat to public order, and mere registration of FIRs for specific offenses may not be sufficie....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the mere registration of FIRs does not necessarily constitute a breach of public order, and the detaining authority must establish a threat to....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the mere registration of FIRs does not necessarily constitute a breach of public order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.