JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Learned advocate Mr. PA Jadeja waives service of rule for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned AGP Ms. Foram Trivedi waives service of rule for respondent Nos.3 to 5.

2. In the petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“(A) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside order dated 13.5.2021 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Lunawada below objection application in LAR No.421 of 2005 with a relief to allow the objection application dated 13.5.2021 and reject the Vakalatnama of new advocate.

(B) Pending admission and final hearing of this petition, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceedings of LAR No.421 of 2005 pending before the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Lunawada till the final disposal of the present petition.”

3. The necessary facts for deciding this petition can briefly be stated thus:-

3.1 The petitioner is practising advocate. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 are the original claimants (in short “the original claimants”) living in Dist: Mahisagar. Their lands were proposed to be acquired by the State Government for Sujla