SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 1292

R. M. CHHAYA
Chauhan Vikramsinh Nansinh – Appellant
Versus
Zala Arjunsinh Fatesinh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. R.K.Mansuri.
For the Defendants : Mr. Palak H. Thakkar, Rule Served.

JUDGMENT :

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 9.11.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Sabarkantha at Himatnagar in MACP no.1388 of 2005, the appellants original claimants have preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

2. Following noteworthy facts emerge from the record of the appeal:

That, the accident occurred on 26.9.2005 at around 08:45 a.m. near Madhavgadh Patiya Talvadi. It is the case of the appellants – original claimants that the deceased Kanchanba, her daughter and her brother were travelling in a jeep bearing registration no.GJ-1 AP-7189 and when the said jeep was passing through Madhavgadh Patiya Talvadi, a truck bearing registration no. GJ-9 V-8732 being driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed with the jeep because of which the jeep run away in the road side and Kanchanba sustained serious injuries and succumbed to the same. An FIR was lodged with the jurisdictional Police Station and the original claimants filed the claim petition under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top