SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 535

NIRZAR S. DESAI
Shekhar Govindbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A.S. Vakil.
For the Respondent: Ms. Nirali Sarda.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard. Learned Advocate, Mr. Vakil, for the petitioner and learned AGP, Ms. Sarda, for the Respondent.

2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged two separate orders, passed by the Collector, Ahmedabad, in respect of two separate piece of lands for which the petitioner had made an application for conversion from agricultural to non-agricultural land and which came to be rejected vide orders dated 18.12.2023, on the ground that the predecessor- in-title of the subject land, sold the same to the petitioner without obtaining necessary permission from the competent authority and therefore, there is breach of the provisions of Section 63 of the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 (in brief, ‘Tenancy Act’).

3. Heard, learned Advocate, Mr. Vakil, appearing for the petitioner and learned AGP, Ms. Sarda, appearing for the Respondent-State.

4. Though, there are two separate petitions filed in respect of two separate lands, but, considering the fact that the orders impugned in both the petitions are passed on the same date and as the parties are also same in both the matters, they are taken-up for hearing together and being disposed of by this common orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top