M. K. THAKKER
Premal Kanaiyalal Parekh Proprietor Of Matangi Jwellaras – Appellant
Versus
Nilesh Dineshbhai Patni – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is filed by the appellant-original complainant challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 13th December, 2017 passed in Criminal Case No.3200055 of 2016 below Exh. 1 by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, N.I.Act Court No. 32, Ahmedabad dismissing the complaint for default which was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
2. It is case of the complainant that the complainant filed the private complaint who is the Goldsmith against the respondent-accused who is LIC agent. The money was lended by the complainant in part for the purpose of purchasing the house during April, 2015. When the amount was demanded back, the cheque bearing No. 555650 dated 28th October, 2015 for the amount of Rs.32,80,000/- was issued in favour of the complainant. On depositing the cheque, it was dishonored with an endorsement of “Fund insufficient” on 29th October, 2015. After following due procedure prescribed under the Act, a private complaint came to be filed before the competent Court. Learned Court has issued the summons after recording the verification vide order dated 13th January, 2016. Thereafter, the matter was kept on 23rd Feb
Babu Singh v. State of U.P. (1978) 1 SCC 579
S. Rama Krishna vs. S. Rami Reddy (Dead) by his Lrs. & Ors. (2008) 5 SCC 535
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of exercising judicial discretion and considering the potential adverse consequences for the complainant in dismissing complaints ....
The court upheld the trial Court's acquittal under Section 256 due to the complainant's prolonged absence, emphasizing the necessity for diligence in prosecution.
The discretion under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must be exercised judicially and fairly without impairing the cause of administration of criminal justice.
The power under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be exercised fairly and judicially without impairing the cause of administration of criminal justice.
The main legal point established is the discretion of the court to adjourn the hearing and the emphasis on deciding cases on merits with a judicial approach rather than dismissing them for default.
The discretion to acquit a defendant due to the complainant's absence must be exercised judicially and fairly, and the court should ensure that the matter is decided on its merits.
The court emphasized the need for the trial court to exercise discretion judiciously and fairly before dismissing a case on technical grounds and highlighted the importance of providing opportunities....
The discretion to dismiss a complaint for non-appearance must be exercised judiciously and fairly, without impairing the cause of administration of criminal justice.
The main legal point established is the need for judicial and fair exercise of discretion by the Magistrate under Section 256 of the Cr.P.C., and the importance of giving parties the opportunity to a....
The court upheld the dismissal of a complaint for non-prosecution, emphasizing the need for timely justice and the consequences of a complainant's repeated absence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.