Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ, D.N.RAY
Piramal Pharma Limited – Appellant
Versus
Gujarat Pollution Control Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of initial petition and context (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against the closure order (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of legal provisions and argument validity (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. final decision and liberty for further appeal (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER :
1. The present petition, presented today in the registry of the High Court, has been summoned and taken up after midday recess on an urgent oral mentioning by the learned Senior Counsels appearing for the petitioner.
2. Heard Mr. Saurabh Soparkar with Mr. Devang Nanavati, learned Senior Advocates assisted by Mr. Rohan Lavkumar, Mr. Aaditya Dave, Ms. Bhanvi Juvekar and Mr. Ashish Prasad, learned Counsels for the petitioner, Mr. Maulik Nanavati, learned advocate assisted by Ms. Manvi Damle, learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 and Mr. Dipak Dave, learned advocate for the respondent No.2 and perused the record.
3. The present petition is directed against a closure order/closure direction dated 03.02.2026 issued by the respondent no.1 - Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) with the reasoning given therein, as under:-
“CLOSURE DIRECTIONS UN
The court upheld the closure of a manufacturing unit for serious environmental violations, emphasizing the authority of pollution boards to act expediently in cases of grave environmental harm.
The Tribunal upheld the closure order for non-compliance with pollution control regulations, affirming the necessity of ensuring environmental standards.
Jurisdiction of the High Court in entertaining a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, in spite of the alternative statutory remedies, is not affected, specially in a case where the au....
Closure order upheld for non-compliance with pollution control directives despite hearings; mandatory consent and bank guarantee required.
Industrial units must obtain necessary pollution-related clearances to operate, and environmental protection laws are backed by the courts.
Appeal to NGT not maintainable absent specific direction under Water Act s.33A or State Board order under Air Act; consent required only for emitting industrial plants – no evidence of pollutant emis....
Administrative decisions must be reasoned and adhere to principles of natural justice to be valid.
The court ruled that a landowner cannot be penalized for a tenant's violation of environmental laws if the owner is not involved in any criminal or harmful activity, affirming the necessity of jurisd....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
