SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Gau) 82

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
K.V. Rathna, J.
JAMUNA BIN
VERSUS
RAMANI MOHAN BARMAN
Criminal Revn. Petn. No. 2 of 1971 (From order of Addl. S.J., Tripura,
Decided on : 10-11-1970, March 9, 1971.

The discretion to stay proceedings in a criminal case pending disposal of a civil suit is to be exercised by the court having regard to the merits and all the circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 344 - STAY OF PROCEEDINGS - DISCRETION OF COURT - FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED - TITLE AND POSSESSION OF LAND - CIVIL SUIT PENDING - CRIMINAL CASE NOT TO BE STAYED.

Fact of the Case:

The accused were charged with theft of paddy crop from land in the possession of the complainant. The accused filed a petition under Section 344 Cr.P.C. for stay of proceedings in the criminal case pending disposal of a civil suit filed by them for declaration of title and confirmation of possession of the same land. The Magistrate and the Sessions Court dismissed the petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the findings in the civil suit regarding title to the land would not dispose of the point that arises in the criminal case and the accused would not in any way be seriously prejudiced if the proceedings of the criminal case are not stayed pending disposal of the civil suit.

Issues: Whether the proceedings in the criminal case should be stayed pending disposal of the civil suit.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the discretion to stay proceedings in a criminal case pending disposal of a civil suit is to be exercised by the court having regard to the merits and all the circumstances of the case. One of the tests would be whether the accused is likely to be seriously prejudiced by the continuance of the criminal proceedings against him during the pendency of the civil proceedings. In the instant case, the court found that the accused would not be seriously prejudiced if the proceedings of the criminal case are not stayed pending disposal of the civil suit.

Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed and the Magistrate was directed to take up the criminal case immediately, try the same from day to day and dispose if of expeditiously.

ORDER

This criminal revision petition is directed against the order of the Addl. Sessions Judge Tripura D/- 10-11-70 confirming the order Dt. 25-11-68 passed by the Magistrate, 2nd Class, Agartala refusing to stay the proceedings in Cr. Case No. 550 of 67, under Section 344 Cr.P.C.

2. On a complaint filed on 19-07-67 by one Shri Ramani Mohan Barman. the respondent herein. Shri Jamuna Bin the revision petitioner and 5 others are prosecuted for offences under Sections 447 and 379 I.P.C. in that on 17-7-67 they have trespassed into the land in the possession of the respondent and committed theft of paddy crop. The said case was taken on file as CR. 550 of 67 for an offence u/s. 379 I.P.C. In respect of the very land from which the accused are alleged to have committed theft of paddy crop. there were proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. (Misc. case 35 of 65) between the respondent herein and Jamuna Bin the revision petitioner. and in those proceedings on 4-11-61 the learned Magistrate passed an order directing that the disputed land shall remain in possession of the respondent herein till evicted in due course of law. Aggrieved by the said order. Jamuna Bin the revision petitioner filed a suit T.S. 104 of 66 for declaration of his title to the land in question and for confirmation of his possession. While that suit was pending the respondent filed the private complaint referred to above. Jamuna Bin and the other accused filed a petition under Section 344 Cr.P.C. in C.R. 550 of 67 before the 2nd Class Magistrate for stay of proceeding of the criminal case pending disposal of the Civil Suit on the ground that the question of title and possession of the land which are to be decided in the civil suit would practically decide the guilt or otherwise of the accused in the criminal case.

On 5-12-67 the learned Magistrate dismissed that application and finding that a prima facie case is made out against the accused framed a charge, against them Under Section 379 I.P.C. and posted the case for cross-examination of the Prosecution witnesses. Against the order refusing to stay the Criminal proceedings, the accused preferred criminal revision petition 3 of 68 before the Session Court and obtained stay of the proceedings. But before the revision petition came up for final disposal T.S. 104 of 66 was reported to have been withdrawn with permission to bring a fresh suit with the result the stay was vacated and revision petition was dismissed Subsequently the revision petitioner filed a fresh suit T.S. 87 of 68 on the same cause of action, on which his earlier suit was filed and thereafter he again filed an application under Section 344 Cr.P.C. before the 2nd Class Magistrate for stay of the proceeding in the Criminal case and learned Magistrate on 25-11-68 dismissed the same observing that there are no fresh grounds to stay the proceedings of the Criminal case. Thereafter the accused Shri Jamuna Bin moved the Sessions Court in Criminal Motion 243 of 68 to make a reference to this court under Sections 435 and 438 Cr.P.C. The Addl. Sessions Judge by his order Dt. 10th November, 1970 dismissed the same finding that no case is made out to stay the criminal proceedings.

3. It is for consideration whether the facts of this case warrant the stay of proceedings in Cr. Case No. 550 of 66 on the file of the 2nd Class Magistrate, Sadar pending disposal of T.S. 87 of 68 on the file of the Munsiff, Sadar.

4. Section 344 Crl.P.C. provides that in every enquiry or trial the proceedings shall be held as expeditiously as possible and in particular. When the examination of witnesses has once begun, the same shall be continued from day to day. Sub-Section (1)(A) thereof gives a discretion to the Court to postpone the commencement of or adjourn any enquiry or trial if it becomes necessary or desirable either due to the absence of a witness or any other reasonable cause. Sometimes a criminal case is requested to be stayed pending disposal of a civil case between the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top