SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Gau) 8

K.LAHIRI
MONORANJAN SINHA – Appellant
Versus
BISHAMBORLAL SABOO – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

This is an application under Section 561-A read with Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, hereinafter to be referred as "the Code," for quashing a complaint case being Case No. 1384-C of 1971 pending in the Court of Shri S.N. Rahman, Magistrate, Ist Class (Judicial) at Gauhati.

2. Mr. J.P. Bhattacharjee, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in the instant case there is no question of appreciating the evidence but it is a case in which by merely looking at the complaint this Court is to decide whether the offence alleged is disclosed or not. The learned counsel submitted that the essential ingredients of the offence are absent in the present case and as such this is a fit case in which this Court should exercise its inherent power under Section 561-A to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court or to secure the ends of justice.

3. The learned Counsel Mr. Bhairab Chandra Sarma appearing on behalf of the Opp. party has argued the case at length. He has contended that this is not a fit case in which the proceedings should be quashed as there are enough materials to establish at least a prima facie case. He submits that at any rate t

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top