SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Gau) 48

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
K. LAHIRI. J.
DEBI BHATTACHARJEE
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM
Criminal Revn. No.129 of 1977,
Decided on : 12 -4 -1982.

To establish the offense of betting, the prosecution must establish that money or valuable security or things were staked by a person on behalf of himself or on behalf of any other person etc. to be won or lost on the happening or determination of an unascertained thing, event or contingency or in relation to game or sports.

Headnote:

ASSAM GAMES AND BETTING ACT, 1970 - SECTION 2(A), 2(D), 14 - BETTING - ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTS - PROOF REQUIRED.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was convicted under Section 14 of the Assam Games and Betting Act, 1970, for selling Teer tickets and possessing instruments of betting. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was found selling Teer tickets and was in possession of Teer tickets, a dot pen, and cash.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the offense of betting, namely, that money or valuable security or things were staked by a person on behalf of himself or on behalf of any other person etc. to be won or lost on the happening or determination of an unascertained thing, event or contingency or in relation to game or sports.

Issues: Whether the prosecution had established the essential ingredients of the offense of betting.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution must establish beyond reasonable doubt that money or valuable security or things are staked to be won or lost on the happening or determination of an unascertained thing, event or contingency in relation to a game or sports. There was absolutely no material to show that the act of selling the said tickets was a part of any betting process.

Final Decision: The court set aside the conviction and sentences imposed on the petitioner.

JUDGEMENT

1. This revision is directed against the conviction of the accused u/s.14 of the Assam Games and Betting Act, 1970. The petitioner was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- in default, to suffer R. I. for another 15 days. On appeal, the conviction and sentences have been upheld by the learned sessions Judge.

2. The case against the petitioner is that on 14-3-1975 at about 2.45 P.M. he was found selling Teer tickets at Maligaon and was found in possession of some "instruments of betting." He was arrested by the Police and the instruments were seized. On completion of investigation the police submitted charge-sheet against the accused. The prosecution examined 4 witnesses. P. W. 1 Anil Paul stated that there was a crowd in front of his shop and Police asked him to sign a seizure list whereupon he put his signature. However, he was never shown what had been seized by the police. He said that he was not aware whether the accused sold any teer tickets. P. W. 2 Arun Patwary said in the same tune. He said that on preparation of the seizure list it was brought to him and he signed it. He said that he saw some teer tickets, dot pen, however, no money was shown to him. He said that he never saw the accused selling teer tickets nor was he reported about it by the Police P.W. 3 A.K. Saha, S.I. of Police (CID) stated that he saw one person selling teer tickets and identified the accused as the person. Teer tickets, cash of Rs. 23.15, one dot pen were seized and the accused was arrested. P. W. 4 Bholanath Bhuyan is S.I. of Police in CID Branch. He stated that he saw the accused selling teer tickets in front of the Chowrangee Hotel and the accused was apprehended by them. The accused was found in possession of teer tickets, cash of Rs. 23.15 P. A seizure list was prepared and subsequently an ejahar lodged.

3. On these evidence the Trial Court held that the Prosecution had established its case beyond reasonable doubt and convicted the accused. The appellate court upheld the conviction and sentences.

4. Gaming or gambling is a misdemeanour by Statute. Ordinarily the acts are taken as fun, pleasure, pastime or means of recreation or excitement. However, law forbids betting and treats them as crimes against public policy. But the constituent of the crime defined in the Act must be proved by the prosecution. The crime alleged against the petitioner was that he was found selling "teer betting tickets" and found in possession of some instruments, like dot pen, teer tickets and cash.

5. By the Assam Game and Betting Act, 1970, the Public Gambling Act, 1867 was extended to the whole of Assam. The said Act takes charge of "Public gambling." However, by virtue of the Assam Act, "betting" was also made a crime. Gambling and betting on games and sports were widespread throughout the State and caused the debasement of public morality and widespread exploitation as well as created threat to public peace and order, therefore, betting on games and sports were also made crimes. The term "bet" has been defined u/s. 2 (a) of "the Act." I extract the relevant provision of the section.

"2. Definition, For the purpose of this Act. unless contrary intention appears in the context :-

(a) 'bet' with all its grammatical variations means any money or a valuable security or thing staked by a person on behalf of himself or on behalf of any other person, by himself or through any agent or any person procured or employed acting for or on his behalf to be lost or won on the happening or determination of an unascertained thing, event or contingency of or in relation to a game or sport and shall include acceptance of a bet.

It shall further include wager wagering contract, totalisator and pool transaction in relation to any game or sport but shall not include a lottery or betting on a horse race when such betting takes place."

"Instrument of betting" has been defined u/s. 2 (d), which reads as under:-

"(d) 'instrument of betti




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top