SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Gau) 30

B.L.HANSARIA, J.SANGMA
STATE – Appellant
Versus
MAJ. W. P. F. ROBERTS – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Hansaria, J. :- These revisions are directed against orders of discharge passed by the learned Special Judge, Kohima, in a case under Section 120B/420/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The broad allegations against the opposite parties were that they had conspired together to cause pecuniry loss to the Union of India by fraudulent means and in furtherance of the conspiracy misappropriated and cheated the Government by misusing official position, a sum of Rs. 1,05,989.13. Though, initially the case was one but it came to be bifurcated as would appear from the two orders of discharge passed by the learned Judge. At first, the case against the opposite parties Major W.P.F. Roberts and Naik Subedar K. P. Verma was taken up and by an order passed on 29-9-78 they were discharged. Subsequently, the case of the remaining accused was gone into and they came to the discharged by an order dated 21-12-71. Feeling aggrieved, the State has preferred these revisions.

2. Shri Hazarika, leanred Special Prosecutor on behalf of the C.B.I., has submitted that the learned Judge applied a wrong section, namely, Sectio














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top