SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Gau) 161

B.N.SINGH NEELAM, D.N.BARUAH
HAZARAT ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Neelam, J. :- This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence so passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Nalbari on 13-9-93 in Sessions Trial No. 34(N) of 1989, by virtue of which all the above named accused-appellants are convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and they are sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- (Two thousand) each in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years.

2. The case of the prosecution, in short, as given by the first informant Sabi Banu Bibi alias Safura Begum the mother of the deceased who figures as P.W. 1 (ejahar Ext. 1) is that in her native village No. 3 Kalipur under Tamulpur Police Station at about 5 O Clock in the morning on 12-10-1987 when her son Baharul Islam had gone to ease himself, all the accused-appellants variously armed seriously injured him by piercing deadly weapon in his chest and abdomen and when he raised alarm the miscreants fled away. The names of the accused-appellants are so detailed in the ejahar with the deadly weapons to be seen in their hands by the first informant at that time.

3. On the basis of the ej









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top