SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Gau) 1

N.G.DAS
SIRISH CHANDRA PAUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TRIPURA – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 9th January, 1992 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Belonia in Sessions Trial No. 19(S.T/B) of 1989 whereby the learned Addl. Sessions Judge convicted the accused-appellant for commission of the offence under Section 307 of I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for six (6) years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- in default of which he is to suffer R.I. for a further period of two months.

2. I have heard Mr. M. L. Roy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. S. Das, the learned Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State of Tripura.

3. The facts of the case in brief are that on 19-1-86 A.D. at about 9.00/9.30 a.m. Sudhangshu Bhattacharjee (P.W. 8) along with Mukunda Paul (P.W. 1) and Rajmohan Shil (P.W. 2) were proceeding towards Bathkhola bazar and as they went near the house of Bhabatosh Biswas (P.W. 7), the accused-appellant suddenly appeared before Sudhagshu Bhattacharjee (P.W. 8) with a dao in his hand and struck successive blows by means of that dao on the person of Sudhangshu Bhattacharjee causing grievous injuries on his person. As a result of these violent







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top